What's good for China is good for the civilized world. What's bad for the U.S. is usually good for the civilized world. It looks like we got two birds with the same stone here. Thanks, Cyrus!
Cyrus, your article overstates China’s"tech gains" by presenting early-stage research as transformative breakthroughs. The Meteor-1 optical chip is a lab prototype co-developed with NTU Singapore, with no commercial use and unverified theoretical TOPS, unlike NVIDIA’s H100, which delivers over 4,000 TOPS in production. The mosquito drone is a concept, not an operational system, with similar tech demonstrated years ago by Harvard. While China leads in consumer drones, it lags far behind U.S. military drone capabilities. I work in the tech industry, this article regurgitates promotional narratives without critical analysis or technical context. Honestly, where did you get the content for this article? Was it fed to you? The one image on the right is the Harvard mosquito drone, announced 6 years ago. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2207687-tiny-flying-insect-robot-has-four-wings-and-weighs-under-a-gram/
What's good for China is good for the civilized world. What's bad for the U.S. is usually good for the civilized world. It looks like we got two birds with the same stone here. Thanks, Cyrus!
This is the equation:
China's technical advancement is equal = to or greater than world peace.
Cyrus, your article overstates China’s"tech gains" by presenting early-stage research as transformative breakthroughs. The Meteor-1 optical chip is a lab prototype co-developed with NTU Singapore, with no commercial use and unverified theoretical TOPS, unlike NVIDIA’s H100, which delivers over 4,000 TOPS in production. The mosquito drone is a concept, not an operational system, with similar tech demonstrated years ago by Harvard. While China leads in consumer drones, it lags far behind U.S. military drone capabilities. I work in the tech industry, this article regurgitates promotional narratives without critical analysis or technical context. Honestly, where did you get the content for this article? Was it fed to you? The one image on the right is the Harvard mosquito drone, announced 6 years ago. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2207687-tiny-flying-insect-robot-has-four-wings-and-weighs-under-a-gram/
thanks for clarifying. Very helpful!
I'm a litte surprised Cyrus let this article stay up, full of misinformation and fabricated images.